‘20% of all wine in the world is fake’ – this expert’s guide will save you a fortune

Last month we placed the fake wines coming out of China under the microscope, asking our followers if they could spot the two fakes from the real deal. Alarmingly, very few people could tell the difference. Counterfeits are a big concern for all wine brands, and not just for Australia’s most iconic brand Penfolds. According to fraud experts, 20% of all wine currently circulating the globe is fake.

With that in mind, I reached out to Australia’s Scott Evers of www.wineauthentication.com.au to help us understand the world of counterfeit wine. Scott is one of only eight people globally  to be mentored by the world’s leading wine fraud expert, Maureen Downey. When fully qualified, Scott will become a TCM Licensed Wine Authenticator. With Maureen’s unparalleled training backing him up, Scott offers this invaluable advice every winelover in the world should heed.

Drew (Wine Wankers): How prevalent are fake wines these days?

Scott Evers: 20% of all wine currently circulating the globe is fake (which is in line with all luxury goods). This is actually a conservative figure and the number is growing each year. It’s not just rare wines that are counterfeited, many more ‘commercial’ wines are now also being counterfeited.

Drew: What’s the easiest way to tell if a wine is fake?

Scott: A bad fake is obvious on first look…. Poor print, wrong paper, misspellings, missing info etc. ‘better’ fakes require experienced authenticators to examine bottles more closely.

Drew: Which wine is the most forged in the world?

Scott: For older wine, the most counterfeited producer is between DRC & Petrus, but Lafite and d’Yquem are up there as well. For a particular bottling of wine, 1945 Mouton is probably most counterfeited. In Asia, Penfolds Grange and Bin 707 are the most highly counterfeited, along with Lafite. The counterfeit trend today is for more current vintages and recent releases of very high-end Burgundy and Bordeaux.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Drew: Is it easier to forge wines these days with the advent of digital printing?

Scott: Yes of course

Drew: What are the top tips for buying genuine wine?

Scott: I have a number of tips but most of it is common sense

  1. Purchase direct from the producer;
  2. Only purchase from merchants who have zero history of selling counterfeits;
  3. Only buy from vendors (auction houses, retailers etc) who can prove the stories of provenance they are telling or have trained authenticators either directly employed or who are a third party consulting to them. (Remember a piece of paper claiming provenance can easily be counterfeited too and this generally is NOT enough proof!);
  4. Only buy wines that have been formally authenticated and registered in the Chai Wine Vault block chain as this guarantees the provenance for the lifetime of that bottle.  Also, look at who merchants are associated with and the company they keep. People who stand alongside merchants/people that knowingly sell counterfeits is a cause for alarm.

Drew: Why is Maureen Downey the world’s best wine fraud expert?

Scott: Many reasons, but this will give you the best info on her https://www.winefraud.com/about-us/team/maureen-downey/. [You cannot cut and paste this exert unfortunately]

Drew: What’s one secret that she’s taught you that you were blown away by?

Scott: That most infamous wine counterfeiters (Rudy Kurniawan etc) unknowingly leave a mark/footprint on their work that is evident across all of their counterfeits. So, experienced authenticators often ascertain as to where/who that fake has come from once they stumble across that common mark.

Drew: What kind of wine are counterfeiters putting in the bottles?

Scott: It varies. Some use other, lesser vintages of the same wine. Some use a combination of cheap wines and flavour additives. Some use a blend of other valuable, but certainly lesser than the bottle they are purporting to represent as authentic. Here are a couple of specific examples that Maureen Downey has come across – I.e. – Marcassin Pinot Noir + other wine, for 1945 DRC Romanee-Conti. Or Duckhorn merlot + Liberty Bay Cellars merlot, + something old for 1940’s/50’s Pomerol. One important point to note is that an unsuspecting buyer does not know what is in a counterfeited wine. This is scary when you consider there are cases where people have died from drinking counterfeited wine! I’ve had very wealthy businessman say to me “oh well, even if it’s a fake wine our VIP guests at the table will see this DRC bottle as being authentic, its more about image and impressing our clients so we will enjoy drinking the wine regardless” – You could imagine the look on their faces when I tell them the story of people dying from drinking fake wine!

Drew: Do you ever use a Coravin to test a wine to see if it’s the real deal – and if so, does it decrease the value of the wine or increase because tasting reveals the quality if good [note: Coravin is a wine preserving system that inserts a needle into the top of allowing wine to be extracted from a bottle without uncorking – it replaces the wine with an inert gas]

Scott: No never, and this is a very important point – Taste is not a measure of authenticity. No one can taste for authenticity. If they could, convicted counterfeiters like Rudy Kurniawan, Hardy Rodenstock, Kahled Rouabab, and Alexandre Lubov etc would not have been able to be so prolific! And yes – piercing with a Coravin destroys the value. Sadly, it is also now a counterfeiting technique by which people drain and refill bottles! Also, again reiterating my point above, you do not know what has been put in a counterfeit bottle of wine, so I for one would certainly not want to taste it if there were red flags to its authenticity.

Drew: Which wine brand has the best security measures in place to stop counterfeiters?

Scott: Ha, the ones counterfeiters do not know about! Maureen and all trainees are abundantly protective of the information we know, and as mentioned Maureen is teaching the very small group of TCM Certified Authenticator trainees (myself included), about the measures producers are using to counter fraud. If we make that public, it is a huge disservice to the producers we are trying to assist! In general, what I can say is that many producers layer anti-fraud technologies, and do not rely on one thing to protect them.

Drew: What’s an average day for a wine fraud investigator look like?

Scott: Not as glamourous as some people may think! Long hours, hard, exhausting and repetitious work, often dirty… but also intriguing, fascinating and you get to meet many fellow wine lovers and incredible cellars around the world! There is a lot of paperwork and repetition required for formal authentication of wines (and sadly not enough drinking), so it’s not all glamour and romance!

Drew: What are some of the tools of your trade?

Scott: Lighting, magnification, measuring, cutting, cleaning, photography…..and a deep knowledge of wine, producers, packaging, technologies/changes, classification systems, food and beverage laws in respective countries, forensic techniques etc

Drew: How expensive are you to hire?

Scott: I am not yet fully trained, so am not yet taking clients for authentication and charging yet…. It is currently being worked out in our business model, but it will be in line with what Maureen and her company charges. I will be offering many different services at different price points. My company called Wine Authentication is registered and we have a website www.wineauthentication.com.au, however I will not start taking clients until I am TCM Master Authenticator qualified and licensed.

Drew: Have you ever been wrong?

Scott: I haven’t started ‘formally’ authenticating yet. That said, I am learning from the best in Maureen Downey who to date has not been proven wrong! The TCM Formal Reporting Methods we use are thorough and exhaustive. We use a 90+ point system to authenticate each bottle, along with other inspection methods required in a laboratory.

Drew: Do you offer a money back guarantee – if so, how does that work?

Scott: Authentication is an art, not a science. I will offer my professional opinion of authenticity. Each client will be presented and agree to a personalized/tailor-made job contract. What I will do is assure clients that I will render findings that I have formally prepared to defend in a court of law, for insurance purposes etc if required. It is our expertise and the rarity of the skill set that our clients are getting.

97 comments

  1. With music and movies going off into cyberspace, the tape, CD and DVD counterfeiting business must have taken as much of a hit as the record producers did. I wouldn’t have thought of wine as a market for counterfeiting, but it makes sense. For some reason, I don’t think we’ll be downloading wine from cyberspace for awhile.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. Great post, a little terrifying to wrap my head around. So how would we know if the Pinot isn’t so, or if the Cabernet or Chardonnay isn’t all the labels say, or worse, if the Sauvignon’s laced with poison? My wine budget doesn’t go to the price range where I’d think it would be worth trying to fake it, and certainly not to the range I’d think I’d need insurance or professional help… wellll, maybe I need professional help, but that’s a different barrel of bacchanalia, isn’t it? Here’s to hoping I need Scott or Maureen, and can afford to hire them, very soon!~DM

    Liked by 1 person

    • my advice – keep buying your wine from reputable shops. And when it comes to everyday wines, you only need to worry if you live in questionable countries renowned for counterfeiting – most western countries should be fine.

      Like

    • Hi there, as I mentioned in the article, it depends on how bad/good the counterfeit is. A bad counterfeit is very easy to spot, even for the novice. The good counterfeits are a lot harder to spot. Commercial wines stand a much lower chance of being counterfeited, although they are on the rise. For example, Angelina Jole and Brad Pitts 20 Euro wines were counterfeited recently in China, read here: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/brad-pitt-and-angelina-jolies-wine-being-copied-by-chinese-counterfeiters-10182074.html.

      The reality is that counterfeiting both commercial and rare wine is on the rise and our mandate is to get these counterfeited wines and perpetrators out of the market as soon as possible.

      Establish a good relationship with your local retailer and buy from them if you cannot purchase direct from the producer, that’s your best bet. If consuming/collecting Rare Wines, then a lot more risk management is necessary.

      If interested, follow my Facebook company page @WineAuthentication, where I post new counterfeit stories and anything relevant for viewers to read.

      Liked by 3 people

  3. …hmm!

    “20%” is a bit high. Think about it – WHY would it be that high? 20% of the world’s wines are not Super Premium, so why counterfeit them?

    UNLESS of course he is referring to the “House Brands” used these days by retail giants like Woolworths. These wines are drinkable, but pretend to be something they are not!

    Liked by 1 person

      • Hello Scott,

        I will stand by my logic and maths.

        Addressing the Telegraph article – during my career, I have experienced many times, the wider Press getting hold of the same piece of misinformation and spreading it like “Chinese Whispers” (no pun intended).

        The top ten wine producing countries alone make the equivalent of 2,444 million 9 litre cases per year. Are you telling me that the world has at least 489 million cases of fake wine in circulation?

        I think you may mean 20% of the world’s SUPER PREMIUM wine…

        Richard Warland R.D.Oen. M.Oe.
        Visiting Expert, Burgundy School of Business & Sonoma State University Wine Business Institute

        Like

    • Yes and it’s getting worse by the day. Your friends may find my posts on current cases and all things Wine Authentication and Fraud interesting. I regularly post these on my Facebook Company page @WineAuthentication and my company page on LinkedIn.

      Liked by 1 person

    • It is a bunch of propaganda Silver Screenings.

      Read my mathematics and think about my numbers…!

      Like

      • Your comments are now starting to become offensive Silk Road Reversed. You are in the minority of your thinking and regardless, you have made your point pretty clear already. Silver screenings I’m happy to speak to you or your friends privately if you have any queries.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Scott I apologise unreservedly if any of my comments have offended you personally.

        However (My English teacher told me that “one” should never start a sentence with “However”)

        …I stand by my numbers.

        If you can refute my calculations I will be happy to go with you!

        Like

    • Hello alcohaulsingapore,

      You and all readers will find these articles interesting. Silk Road Reversed’s comments are correct in stating that the 20% figure relates to Fine Wine (but its not only Fine Wine). He is, however incorrect in his view that the overall wine market of counterfeits is significantly less than this. Over the past few years, the amount of ‘commercial wine’ counterfeits coming out of China alone is extraordinary. Silks Road Reversed’s figures he quoted in earlier comments do not take into account the amount of this counterfeit wine circling the globe.

      Here are some articles:

      20% of ALL Wine’s Sold are Counterfeit:

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/10421271/Fifth-of-wine-sold-worldwide-is-fake.html

      50% of wine in China is fake:

      http://www.dinnerpartydownload.org/wine-fraud/

      5% of wines at auction are fake:

      http://www.bbc.com/news/business-28697721

      30% alcohol is fake; 20% of ALL wine is fake – quoted by Wine Spectator experts:

      http://www.winesandvines.com/template.cfm?section=features&content=136584

      Nick Bartman says 70% of ALL Chinese wine is fake:

      http://www.jancisrobinson.com/articles/fighting-fakes-in-china-part-2

      Total Value of Wine Market Globally

      $304B (USD) up 17.9% since 2011 (Business Wire)
      Fine Wine represents 5-7% total global wine industry annually. (Mordor Intelligence)

      With these stats, 5% of $304B market is $15B and 20% of this market being fake is $3B fake fine wine in the market. With the amount counterfeits now being produced at the commercial end of the market, the counterfeit figure of ALL wine is around the 20% mark – and its growing!

      Liked by 2 people

      • Scott, do you realise what your self-serving posts are doing to our wine industry?

        I am tiring of this discussion, so you might win, but I will ensure that the Australian industry is made aware of your unhelpful contribution to consumer confidence.

        The articles you refer to above are mixed and confused in their message. In a number of cases the same quote has been reproduced out of context.

        I maintain that we are talking about FINE WINE.

        Think about it – France alone sells 22 million 9 litre cases of Vin de Pays per year. Add to that the bottled Vins Ordinaire & VDP equivalent of Spain, Italy, Germany, Argentina, Chile, the USA and Australia and many lesser producers. Why would anyone want to counterfeit these wines?

        Yes China may have a high number of wines with fake labels, (and that will change as the Chinese become more wine aware, as it has with Designer Goods) but China’s total annual sales of bottled wine are only around 130 million cases.

        Each year the world buys around 2.7 Billion cases of wine. Even if 50% of the bottled wine sold in China was fake (which it is not – I lived and worked there for 9 years by the way) that amounts to 2% of the worlds wine sales
        .
        Please let’s end this debate. You have plenty to do detecting high-end fakes, so please don’t scare consumers with the idea that 20% of ALL bottled wine is counterfeit!

        Like

      • Scott, at the risk of ‘poking the bear’, I make a point of teaching my students a valuable lesson in my first class: ‘The importance of using quality data’. I start by asking them all to write down, on average, what the delay is between consumers drinking wine after they’ve purchased it. I also ask them how confident they are of their estimates. The results are that their values differ greatly, yet they’re all confident of their estimates because someone in the wine trade told them those numbers….

        Kind of like your opinion-based, yet empirically questionable, quotes from well-meaning individuals above. Even the quote on the 20% value is from a group called ‘the elite Grand Cru producers’, of Burgundy and Bordeaux. Hardly your average wine consumer’s tipple….

        The numbers from Business Wire don’t hold up to Euromonitor, or the OIV figures (http://www.oiv.int/public/medias/5479/oiv-en-bilan-2017.pdf) either. The relation between their 17.9% increase could be the value figures for wine from 2011-16, but these were based on export numbers, and not the total value of the wine market.

        If you can find some empirically supported evidence that these 20% estimates are for the entire wine market, I’d be concerned. However, based on what has been posted above, I’d suggest we need to take the heat out of this topic, instead of casting assertions at a potentially damaging message on the wine market.

        Best from California,
        Damien Wilson
        Hamel Chair of the Wine Business Institute
        Sonoma State University

        Liked by 1 person

  4. Scott, you say yourself that “Commercial wines stand a much lower chance of being counterfeited, although they are on the rise.”
    That comment alone should be enough to demolish your contention that 20% of *all* wine is counterfeit, and linking to an old Telegraph post about Mouton Rorthschild fakery, by a writer who misspells Pinot Noir hardly supports your argument.
    At least 95% of the world’s wine fits into that ‘commercial’ category.
    Wine is one of the most heavily regulated products on earth. The French govt has huge volumes of data on the distribution of every drop of wine produced i that country.
    Every now and then, there’s a minor scandal when a producer sells a few batches of IGP as AOP, but it’s rare – and swiftly uncovered – like supermarkets selling horse instead of beef.
    I go to China quite often, and yes it’s more of a Wild West there. And I’d even accept that 20% of the wine *there* might be fake – but that wouldn’t help you get to your 20% global figure.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. 20% sounds way off to me. And how can you seriously draw a parallel between “all wine” and “all luxury goods”? Let’s talk about luxury wine, and what proportion of that might be fake, but before doing that you need to define luxury wine. And what really gets me is how people spout numbers like these as it if they are facts. Who really knows how much fake wine is out there? How can you quantify it?

    Liked by 1 person

    • These are good questions to ask Huon – have you come across many fakes in your days? Have you investigated this area much for the SMH or travelled through China to see the issue first hand? As Maureen says below in the comments….

      “In 2002/2003, when I first caught Rudy Kurniawan, Eric Greenberg and John Kapon of Acker Merrall and Condit knowingly selling counterfeit wine – I was attacked in the same manner. ‘Cant Be!’ ‘NO! Not them! They are great guys!’ ‘You are just jealous/vindictive/being Chicken Little!’ I used to naysayers, and deniers. I have been dedicated to this aspect of the industry since 2000, I know the reality of the problem, and I am very used to the denial.

      It took a decade for Rudy to get arrested, and another year for the Greenberg truths to come out in court. I was right about all of that, and continue to be vindicated about Acker Merrall & Condit’s sale of counterfeit wines. Fail to believe the truth of the scope of the problem at your own peril. David Doyle in Australia purchased $15.5 million from Rudy K direct. Where is that wine?”

      Liked by 1 person

      • Hi Drew,
        I’m not a naysayer or a denier, nor I think are most of those who have questioned the 20% figure. I just found it hard to believe, but having read all the comments with interest and especially Maureen’s lengthy comment today, I am more prepared to believe it than I was!

        Liked by 2 people

      • We’ve known each other for 20 years this year – and I’ve always looked up to you as one of the world’s best wine journalists! Thanks for you thoughts Huon! Im honoured to have your contribution on our little blog! 🙂

        Like

      • Hi Huon. Do the maths. Note that Maureen does not even say “bottled wine”. Have you ever encountered a counterfeit Wine Cask… ?

        Like

  6. HI Silk Road Reversed – firstly – thanks for your passionate debate here with Scott. It’s very important you realise Scott didn’t approach me to write this article – I approached him, after he commented on the original David Brookes Penfolds 389 post on the Wine Wankers LinkedIn page. Scott is being trained by the world’s leading expert in wine fraud. He is more an expert in this area than I will ever be and he has backed up all his claims with evidence from the world’s most influential wine publications. I also appreciate where you are coming from as well – the numbers are extraordinary.
    I take it you live in Australia, I think in general, fake wines are not a problem in countries like Australia, especially when you are buying them in retail. Perhaps its only the super premium wines being sold at auction are where we may have greater concern, and this is where the services of someone like Scott will become more important as these wines become hotly sought after and the fakes become more difficult to discern. Or if fake Grange and 707s from China start to infiltrate the Australian auction scene. We already know these two are often copied, according to Scott.
    Thanks for your input, it’s greatly appreciated.

    Like

    • G’day Drew. Thank you for moderating this one-sided debate. Yes I now live in Australia – The Adelaide Hills to be precise. I returned in 2014 after 9 years of living in China.

      My credentials? I am a RoseworthyCollege Oenology graduate. Class of 70/71 – luminaries include John Ellis of Hanging Rock, Doug Bowen of Bowen Estate, Mike Press, Robin Moody of Somerled, Neil Paulett and Colin Glaetzer.

      I was in the wine industry from 1968 till 2005 before moving to China, where I worked in CRM/Loyalty Marketing (a skill I developed whilst in direct marketing of wine over 22 years).

      I have no axe to grind with Scott. I just don’t want to see him causing doubt in the minds of “everyday” consumers.

      Let’s face it – “House Brands” are increasingly becoming a fact of life in Australia.

      Mate – I ran The Wine Society between 1983-1987 and we were openly selling our “House Brand”.

      The difference these days is that Woolies & Coles (more Woolies because they own Dorrien Estate) are selling “House Brands” that pretend to be from a winery. The wine quality is fine, but the marketing strategy is designed to lift the price above commercial brands.

      Is that “Fake Labels”?

      Like

  7. Hello all-

    The fact is that the international crime stats for counterfeit levels of all luxury goods is 20%, including wine. (Electronics, handbags, watches, sneakers, perfume….) You can protest as much as you want, you can cry and pound your fists- you can, Mr Silk Road, do your own math and conclude that everyone else including Interpol is wrong, but 20% is the actual number. And in some sales venues, especially brokering, in certain locales- Belgium, Italy, Switzerland, ASIA – that is very conservative indeed.

    Admittedly, Asia brings up the stats in both luxury and the lowest end, but globally, 20% is more than fathomable. (Pharmaceuticals are at 30% in emerging markets. Wrap your head around that.) Nick Bartman, a British attorney, who has spent years researching counterfeits in Asia has stated that 70% of all wine in China is fake.

    Counterfeit wine is not confined to bottles made to look like a famous vintage from famous producer: Recreations, as we call them. Counterfeit wine also encompass IP infringement (close but intentionally wrong, as often found all over Asia) Illegally altered and/or mislabeled wine: wrong Grapes, wrong Vintage, wrong Origin. Refilled bottles. Relabeled bottles. Wines with adulteration like those that kill. Why do you think French farmers overturned tankers of Spanish bulk wine in the south of France recently? Many of the counterfeit wines in China contain no grape product at all.

    I work in this area every day. From the 20k bottles of counterfeit Carlo Rossi that were recently found in a warehouse operation in China, which had allegedly been operating for years, to the recent conviction of Alex Aniken/Alexander Iubov, and his Italian counterparts, for making millions in fake DRC, to the gents in Canada importing bulk Italian red, bottling and selling it as Brunello di Montalcino & Chianti Classico Riserva out of an Indian Reservation, to the counterfeit Mireval all over the globe – wine fraud permeates all markets. There are entire areas of a huge wine show in Asia dedicated to counterfeit fine wines.

    I recently inspected a small but very high end and nothing but great vintage – aka counterfeiters sweet spot- collection: Out of 1000 bottles, I inspected 267. Of those, 96 were counterfeit. $2.482Million in counterfeits, sold to one family. Over a million of that sold by just one firm to the collectors. This is not an isolated incident. We see this all the time, all over the world.

    You can decry the facts and the government stats all you want – that is what people typically do when they want to kill the messenger rather than face the honest and valid message being presented. You can call out the messenger for starting a sentence with a word you don’t like – classic deflection. Stay opaque. You may teach at Sonoma State, you may have been in the industry for decades (if you have and you still don’t know the scope of this problem, it’s time to pull your finger out!) you can cry and winge – all your denial does not change the fact that 20% of wine globally is counterfeit.

    In 2002/2003, when I first caught Rudy Kurniawan, Eric Greenberg and John Kapon of Acker Merrall and Condit knowingly selling counterfeit wine – I was attacked in the same manner. ‘Cant Be!’ ‘NO! Not them! They are great guys!’ ‘You are just jealous/vindictive/being Chicken Little!’ I used to naysayers, and deniers. I have been dedicated to this aspect of the industry since 2000, I know the reality of the problem, and I am very used to the denial.

    It took a decade for Rudy to get arrested, and another year for the Greenberg truths to come out in court. I was right about all of that, and continue to be vindicated about Acker Merrall & Condit’s sale of counterfeit wines. Fail to believe the truth of the scope of the problem at your own peril. David Doyle in Australia purchased $15.5 million from Rudy K direct. Where is that wine?

    In the last months, I have seen in Europe (& some in bond no less!) counterfeit Ramonet, DRC in OWC, 2005 Clos du Tart, Lafleur, Mouton, Sassicaia, Tignanello 2009 & 2014 – in OWC. There are also lots of current vintage Dugat, Dugat-Py, Roumier & Rouget, 1992 & 1993 Screaming Eagle, and of course, mountains of Henri Jayer crossing borders in Europe and pouring into other markets. Here in California, I just saw counterfeit Shafer Hillside Select, Screaming Eagle & Second Flight as well as Harlan.

    We, as professionals and wine authenticators – do not throw out numbers for nefarious reasons. It is totally inappropriate and wrong of you to chastise Scott for being honest, in an opaque wine market. You can dismiss the facts all you want – but that does not change them.

    At least 20% of all wine globally sold, is counterfeit.

    Sincerely,
    Maureen Downey

    Maureen Downey, DWS, CWE
    @moevino @WineFraud
    Chai Consulting WineFraud.com #ChaiWineVault
    Awarded Top 50 Most Powerful Women in the World of Wine, Drinks Business
    The Sherlock Holmes of Wine, Decanter
    Featured in the film Sour Grapes, available on Netflix

    Liked by 3 people

  8. I have read this article a couple of times, and I am still left scratching my head. Who is Scott Evers, and why is he being consulted when he has not completed his “counterfeit wine identification training”? Mr. Evers continues to boast about Maureen Downey. Maureen this, and Maureen that. Maureen, Maureen, Maureen! What about you Scott?

    As a certified sommelier, wine appraiser, counterfeit wine identification specialist, and wine expert I can tell you that delving into the area of potential “counterfeit wines” is a like stepping into the proverbial hornets nest. Ask Michael Broadbent (Christies former Wine Auction Director) who positively identified the Thomas Jefferson Chateau Haut Brion bottle, which was ultimately was revealed as a counterfeit wine. Even the wine experts make mistakes.

    I respect Maureen Downey as a peer and fellow professional. I find it humorous that the press and journalists appear to focus almost exclusively on her as a counterfeit wine identification specialist. It was the documentary “Sour Grapes” about Rudy Kurniawan that launched her career. There are certainly a hand full of counterfeit wine identification experts out there aside from Maureen Downey.

    I was an expert for the defense in the Bill Koch counterfeit wine case against Royal Wine Merchants Ltd. Thankfully, Royal Wine merchants settled, and that was a truly smart decision on their part.

    Sincerely,

    Tom DiNardo – sommelier, wine expert, and CEO of Winery & Wine Appraisals
    http://WineryandWineAppraisals.com

    Liked by 1 person

    • thanks for your input Tom – if you believe differently and would like to write a couple of paragraphs on your thoughts about the above topic – i would be more than happy to include it in the article as an update.

      Like

  9. Tom – I have been authenticating wine since 2000. Your statement that “It was the documentary “Sour Grapes” about Rudy Kurniawan that launched her career.” is as laughable as it is insulting. It is in fact a straight up lie. Jealous much?

    I have been recognized as an expert in wine authentication since 2002, for almost 2 decades, and well before Rudy was even arrested – much less the release of Sour Grapes last year. Jancis Robinson has been writing about me in the Financial Times and elsewhere as a counterfeit wine expert and a vehement anti-fraud expert since 2006/2007. I have been an expert in many cases, including the case against Rudy Kurniawan, a case I started working on with the FBI in 2008. I train the FBI in the USA on wine fraud. (Perhaps you need a quick peek at the press pages on my websites, if you are really this out of touch with reality: https://www.winefraud.com/about-us/press/ & http://www.chaiconsulting.com/press/)

    I have no idea what your credentials are in terms of authentication. I have never heard that you are an expert in authentication – except here, by you. In fact, your name has not once, ever come up as someone who even does authentication in any conversation I have ever had. Not with colleagues, press, the myriad of attorneys i am constantly in contact with/working with – no one, and I talk about this all day, all the time, with people all over the world. Your ‘credentials’ are not exactly mind-blowing: Certified Somm – yep, got that when I was 22, took the advanced MS at 23, on crutches. Wine Appraiser – yep, since 2000. “counterfeit wine identification specialist” according to whom, please?

    That you were an “expert” for Royal Wine Merchants, one of the worst sellers of counterfeit wines in modern history – who got slapped into oblivion by Koch and his team – speaks volumes about your ‘ability’ as an authenticator. I would not go bragging about this, as it does not serve as anything but a dark mark against you. I do not consider you a peer, when it comes to authentication.

    My recognition is not unmerited, and has not come without well fought battles. For over 10 years I was screaming into a black hole about wine fraud and counterfeiting. Until Rudy was arrested – more people than not attacked me for saying RK, Greenberg,Kapon, Royal Wine Merchants and many others that have been found to be doing so, were selling counterfeit wines. Where were you Tom? Oh – working for the bad guys…

    Since 2013, I have to take body guards to large tastings as I have been physically assaulted, and am verbally accosted all the time – coincidentally, it’s even happening in the upper left screen corner of Sour Grapes in the very opening of the film… I’ve been slammed on wine boards by those that want the fraud to keep on going since 2002. Wine Fraud is a very lucrative business after all. In all this time, I’ve never seen you chime in as an expert in any of those threads. And now you are going to jump in and attack me, joining the ranks of John Kapon, Rob Rosania, Eric Greenbeg and Gil Lempert-Schwarz? Well – You are in amazing company there Tom…

    Scott has just started training. His stats are correct. His data is what is in the public realm, and supported by Interpol, and other international governing bodies fighting crimes. We do not make up stats like this, just as we do not work for crooks.

    Attacking Scott is totally out of line.

    I look forward to your apologies, to both me and to Scott.

    Sincerely,
    Maureen Downey, DWS, CWE

    The Sherlock Holmes of Wine
    BBC4 The Wine Detectives – http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b08vxv32

    Liked by 1 person

    • Good on you Lloyd. The wine industry has too many self-appointed “experts”. We who have worked in the industry since the 1960s have seen them all! They do the industry no good by scaring and/or confusing the general public.

      Like

      • Anyone who has worked in the wine industry since the 1960’s, and is not honest about the current issue of counterfeits permeating all tiers of all markets, is either ignorant beyond belief because they are completely out of touch with current conditions, making them inept, or because they want to protect the fraudsters and bad actors more than consumers.

        I’ve been watching it happen for 16 years….

        Like

      • Oh Maureen, why do you persist with this pointless argument? You are just making Scott and yourself look silly.
        As I originally said, 20% of the world’s FINE wine may be fake but not 20% of ALL wine!

        The world’s biggest wine brand is Barefoot. Australia is up there with Yellow Tail and Jacob’s Creek. So to is Paul Mas Arrogant Frog and CyT Casillero del Diablo. OK wines, but mass produced and “commercial”. Why would anyone want to counterfeit them?

        Here in China “the Big Three” Dynasty, Great Wall and Changyu reds consist of 50-60% Australian & Chilean wine. “Fake” to imply they are 100% Chinese, but no less deceptive than all big commercial wines from the “New World” which often consist of externally sourced wine.

        As for saying I am out of touch and inept… Maureen, I know more about the international wine industry than you will ever know! I am an Oenology (Enology to you) graduate; apart from being a trophy winning winemaker, I have worked in wholesaling, marketing and general management for 49 years – in Australia, New Zealand, Asia, Europe, the UK and the USA.

        For 14 years I was a senior executive and buyer for Cellarmaster Wines, at the time, the world’s biggest DtC marketer with operations in 9 countries. We bought and sold in excess of 5 million cases annually.

        In closing – I might add that many of my friends such as Robert Joseph, Debra Meiburg MW, Huon Hooke, Michael Hill-Smith MW, Andrew Caillard MW and I could easily identify a counterfeit Fine Wine – just by tasting it…

        Like

      • And claiming that anyone can authenticate via taste (even those friends we have in common) just shows that you actually know – absolutely nothing about the realities of counterfeit and fraudulent wine.

        Mic Drop.

        Like

  10. Thanks to all for your passionate comments. Statistics and opinions aside, I think most of us agree that fake wines are a problem that need to be addressed. It shouldn’t be a taboo subject any longer.
    I have been in the wine industry for some 18 years now, and those that have cast me as someone out there who wants to cause damage to our industry, do not know me very well. I have made the decision to move into this field primarily because in time I want to play a small role in getting these fake wines out of the market, and to help producers and vendors to better protect their brands and business. If that is not playing a part in helping our industry, then I’m sorry to those that think that.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Reblogged this on The Prolific Mind and commented:
    The original post is from ‘The Wine Wankers’.
    I haven’t really encountered any fake wines…or did I??? This is useful information, my friends. Please read on for your personal benefit. Thanks!

    Like

    • G’day Scott,

      I thought we had agreed to stop this pointless debate. You and your mentor are just digging a deeper grave.

      Do you not READ the thread? Two of my friends mentioned have already commented on the illogical idea that 20% of ALL the world’s wine is counterfeit. In addition Debra has privately given me her support but as she is too busy she has chosen not to involve herself.

      Further, your mentor, Maureen, is full of the proverbial. (Which is not unusual for a citizen of the USA… who generally think that the world begins on their East coast and ends on their West coast ). …and that is PARTICULARLY so in the Wine game.

      The French did not destroy Spanish wine because it was fake. They did it because it was cheap and undermining their market.

      Professional tasters CAN detect whether a Fine Wine is fake or not.

      … and finally a bit more logic… winemakers are effectively food scientists. Wine is a beverage for human consumption. If it looks like Mouton Rothschild and it smells like Mouton Rothschild and it tastes like Mouton Rothschild…

      …does anyone really care ?

      Cheers

      Your new friend

      Richard

      PSI I know Maureen will have another go at me and I may not respond immediately as I am currently behind The Great Firewall of China

      Th

      Like

      • Dear Richard,

        I know literally nothing about you except your name, but I suspect you would gain a great deal more credibility if you would consider addressing the person you’re talking to directly, instead of, for example, a proxy named Ward Clever, who may or may not pass your message on to its intended target.

        Signed,

        A Person Slightly Put Off At The Disparagement Of His Country With No Basis

        Like

      • …er my apologies “Ward Clever “. If you read my previous replies, you will know A LOT more about me than I do about you…and I don’t hide behind a pseudonym.

        If you are objecting to my generalized comment about US citizens, I make no apology. I have worked for a multinational US company and I have lived and worked in the USA.

        What percentage of USD citizens even have a passport ?

        Liked by 1 person

      • A passport would be indicative of what? You can’t even pay attention to whom you are making your abrasive comments, so how intelligent am I likely to think you are? (Hint: not very.)
        Also, “if you read my previous replies” – please, I’m not doing your work for you, cretin. Your pseudonym is “Silk Road Reversed” from where I sit, because I actually pay attention to whom I am responding.

        Speaking of paying attention, “USD citizens”? Maybe lay off the Zima and sober up before responding any further?

        Like

  12. Richard I would be very surprised if any of those important industry figures that you just mentioned (and all of whom I have the greatest respect for), would want an association with your alarmingly ignorant and misguided quote stating: “I might add that many of my friends such as Robert Joseph, Debra Meiburg MW, Huon Hooke, Michael Hill-Smith MW, Andrew Caillard MW and I could easily identify a counterfeit Fine Wine – just by tasting it…”

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks for the information Sediment Blog. Yes, I admit I may be wrong in this case (and I will ALWAYS do so if I am presented with imperical evidence which disputes my argument ).

      …but so far, NONE of the arguments put up by Scott & Maureen have convinced me that their claim is correct.

      Please refer back to Dr. Damien Wilson’s point.

      Like

  13. Those of us forced for financial reasons to spend most of their time outside the fine wine market may be thought to have little to offer this debate. However…

    Richard Warland above specifically mentions Jacob’s Creek as one of the “commercial” brands which no-one would bother to counterfeit. However, a few years ago it was revealed that there was indeed fake Jacob’s Creek on the shelves in the UK, identifiable only by a spelling mistake on the label. Here’s a BBC report: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-12992242

    Just saying.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Richard I appraise wine weekly through my other business, and have done so for 17 years. Maureen is a wine show judge…BUT….you are completely missing the point here! Counterfeit wine can be dangerous. You have no idea how that wine was made, what chemicals have been added….and there are cases where people have died from consuming fake wine. That is fact! Consumers must be aware of this, and it’s the primary reason why I have chosen to specialise in this field – to help get these counterfeits out of the market BEFORE they consume them.
    You specialise in the wine consumer market and it should be your duty to inform and protect your clients, along with all wine consumers.

    Like

    • Yes Scott and in China MANY people have died because of fake food products…

      But I go back to my two original points –

      1 Twenty percent of ALL the Wine in the world is not fake.

      2. By stating the above you are causing damage to all reputable wine makers world wide.

      As the lawyers say. I rest my case. Goodbye.

      Like

  15. Let me preface this by saying I am LOVING this debate going on here, though I would appreciate if people could make it a little less personal and a bit more about the arguments and supporting evidence.

    I personally consume from the low range of the market, rarely going above AUD$40/bottle at bottlo/cellar prices. The main thing I love about this article is that I have seen wines from the same range and vintage, right next to each other on the shelf, with slightly different labels. My thoughts at the time were simply “Oh, that’s interesting” and I returned to trying to select something to purchase.

    Is it likely that something is amiss here, or is it more a case that at my price point as much care isn’t taken between printings for the labels? I moved on under the assumption it was the latter. I can’t recall any more the specifics behind the bottles this was observed in, nor even the location.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. I agree with “too personal ” Byorgen and I will not continue with Mr “Clever ” except to say that I might have addressed the wrong person because it is difficult to follow this thread on my small screen while on the move in China.

    …and yes you may see printing irregularities on Australian labels but it is unlikely that the wines are counterfeit. Cheers Richard

    Like

  17. Thank you all for an interesting and spirited debate! As someone just getting started out in the industry on the ‘sell’ side it has opened my eyes to potential issues with wine fraud and how to best minimise the risk. I think ‘raising awareness’ is the most important thing to come out of this article and debate.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. Here is the latest wine fraud to come out of France. This is a BULK (commercial) wine scandal from one of France’s leading bulk wine bottlers:

    “A new wine scandal is evolving in France following the arrest of the chairman of one of the country’s leading bulk wine bottlers, Raphaël Michel, on fraud charges. It is alleged that part of the fraud included passing off as much as 300,000 hectolitres (over 3 million cases) of wine classified as Vin de France as Côtes du Rhône, Châteauneuf du Pape and other AOC.”

    https://www.thedrinksbusiness.com/2017/08/fraud-scandal-rocks-frances-leading-bulk-bottler/

    http://www.winespectator.com/webfeature/show/id/French-Wine-Company-Chairman-Arrested

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Scott -Fret not about this Richard person.
    I have never heard of him, so he is clearly no industry luminary.
    It is obvious that he is here to be a contrarian and insult. And you know what they say: If you wrestle with a pig, you’re gonna get covered in mud. So stay out of the pit, and leave the mud to others. We have too much good work to do!
    I have had 17 years of men, old and young, being demeaning and dismissing what I know to be true. Then an arrest happens, and another, a court case is won, a then another settle awarded… Over time, I’ve been right. I also train the FBI in the USA, and am a bit more familiar with the stats than some blind ‘ITBer that I’ve never heard of/read about….

    Interesting news today though: Fraud scandal rocks France’s leading bulk bottler
    https://www.thedrinksbusiness.com/2017/08/fraud-scandal-rocks-frances-leading-bulk-bottler/

    “It is alleged that part of the fraud included passing off as much as 300,000 hectolitres (over 3m cases) of wine classified as Vin de France as Côtes du Rhône, Châteauneuf du Pape and other AOC.”
    Côtes du Rhône, not exactly the Fine & rare category….

    Here is another take on the issue:
    http://www.winespectator.com/webfeature/show/id/French-Wine-Company-Chairman-Arrested

    Awaiting apologies from all over the place now.
    MD 😉

    Like

    • “It’s understood that there is no health risk involved with any of the wine, which was made for drinking and not cellaring. None of the wine concerned is currently available for sale in New Zealand.” …and what, prey tell, Can you do to discover this that the NZ Wine Authorities could not do…

      Like

  20. We call this, “moving the goal post.”

    Richard’s first Post
    “Silk Road Reversed
    June 23, 2017 at 12:22 pm

    …hmm!

    “20%” is a bit high. Think about it – WHY would it be that high? 20% of the world’s wines are not Super Premium, so why counterfeit them?”

    Post #2
    “Silk Road Reversed
    June 27, 2017 at 11:17 am
    Hello Scott,
    I will stand by my logic and maths.
    Addressing the Telegraph article – during my career, I have experienced many times, the wider Press getting hold of the same piece of misinformation and spreading it like “Chinese Whispers” (no pun intended).
    The top ten wine producing countries alone make the equivalent of 2,444 million 9 litre cases per year. Are you telling me that the world has at least 489 million cases of fake wine in circulation?
    I think you may mean 20% of the world’s SUPER PREMIUM wine…
    Richard Warland R.D.Oen. M.Oe.”

    Yes, we are sharing the data from law enforcement and other sources that maintain that 20% of wine in the world is counterfeit. Further that that number is not confined to the SUPER PREMIUM category.

    In the last week, we have heard of scandals that affect more than 48million cases of commercial level wine, as specifically described in the reporting, being counterfeited by ONLY TWO firms. This speaks to Richard’s concerns about the fact that YES, these commercial category is included and that that counterfeit wine is not only a problem for the FINE WINE/ Super-Premium category:
    1. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-12992242
    2. http://www.winespectator.com/webfeature/show/id/French-Wine-Company-Chairman-Arrested
    3. https://www.thedrinksbusiness.com/2017/08/fraud-scandal-rocks-frances-leading-bulk-bottler/
    4. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11898422

    Post #7
    “Silk Road Reversed
    July 16, 2017 at 4:41 pm
    Scott, do you realise what your self-serving posts are doing to our wine industry?
    I am tiring of this discussion, so you might win, but I will ensure that the Australian industry is made aware of your unhelpful contribution to consumer confidence.
    The articles you refer to above are mixed and confused in their message. In a number of cases the same quote has been reproduced out of context.
    I maintain that we are talking about FINE WINE.

    Please let’s end this debate. You have plenty to do detecting high-end fakes, so please don’t scare consumers with the idea that 20% of ALL bottled wine is counterfeit!”

    New Evidence shows all categories are affected. Richard can no longer maintain that it must only be FINE WINE, not commercial level wine that is counterfeited.
    But here, Richard starts to attack the press. When faced with the evidence, he will attack the messenger. At least he is consistent.
    The news of the past week blows the only FINE WINE is counterfeited argument out of the water, now doesn’t it? 4+ MILLION cases of commercial not FINE wines counterfeited.

    Post 16
    “Richard Warland
    July 31, 2017 at 10:40 pm
    Thanks for the information Sediment Blog. Yes, I admit I may be wrong in this case (and I will ALWAYS do so if I am presented with imperical evidence which disputes my argument ).”

    With over 4 MILLION cases of commercial level wines counterfeited, by just two firms, I expect Richards need for Empirical Evidence (note spelling) has been presented, adequately disputing his arguments. Still he has failed to admit that he is wrong, and digs in with personal attacks.

    Post #17
    “Silk Road Reversed
    August 1, 2017 at 11:48 am
    Yes Scott and in China MANY people have died because of fake food products…
    But I go back to my two original points –
    1 Twenty percent of ALL the Wine in the world is not fake.
    2. By stating the above you are causing damage to all reputable wine makers world wide.
    As the lawyers say. I rest my case. Goodbye.”

    Post #20:
    “Silk Road Reversed
    August 3, 2017 at 3:10 pm
    “It’s understood that there is no health risk involved with any of the wine, which was made for drinking and not cellaring. None of the wine concerned is currently available for sale in New Zealand.” …and what, prey tell, Can you do to discover this that the NZ Wine Authorities could not do… (sic)”

    With the previously requested evidence now presented, combined with this statement from Richard, “Yes, I admit I may be wrong in this case (and I will ALWAYS do so if I am presented with imperical (sic) evidence which disputes my argument ).” I would have expected him to come back with a “wow, as a man of my word, I was wrong. I am sorry Scott and Maureen. Thank you for what you are doing to protect all wine lovers, producers and consumers.”

    But no – Richard completely pivots to a new argument and posts about the potential health risk of the wine. A topic NOT part of his two points as seen in previous posts, and as defined in his #Post 17 above.

    That is the textbook definition of “moving the goal post.”

    Like

    • I beg your pardon Maureen. YOU are the one who moves the goal posts (and I am not so petty as to dig out your factually incorrect claims).

      The New Zealand wine was NOT “fake” or “counterfeit” nor was the Spanish wine destroyed by the French.

      You are attracting the attention of some of my friends who ARE wine industry “luminaries”. If you want to end this pathetic game of ping pong PLEASE present empirical evidence of your “20%” claim!

      Like

  21. So Interesting: Richard – it appears that the Dean, the Executive Director and Distinguished Professor, Dr. Liz Thach, MW, at the Wine Business Institute, Sonoma State University – have NEVER EVEN HEARD of you either… Didn’t you post that as part of your credentials here?
    How have none of these people heard of you if you are involved with SSU?

    If you need “impirical (sic) evidence” ask your buddy Damien – who is copied on the email chain with all the SSU folks.

    I am not here to appease you, or any other old troll who is not germane to today’s wine world. Those in the industry that matter – are incredibly supportive.I’m not worried about you, or your nay-sayers. As my mentor and dear friend once told me – in her very proper British accent, just before she published a piece on me in the Financial times: “haters are gonna hate.”

    The numbers we have been given, and site are scary indeed. But they are also what the world is facing in wine, and in pharmaceuticals and all other luxury goods. Ignoring the real stats is not doing anyone by the fraudsters – who are ramping up to be sure on the fuel of deniers – any good!

    Amazing though – that no one at Sonoma State has even heard of you…. was that a lie?

    The expected apologies are sure racking up!

    Maureen Donwey
    http://www.WineFraud.com
    #ChaiWineVault

    Like

    • Yes Maureen the expected apologies from you are racking up by every insulting post. Funny that when I get home from China I have a cheque (check) waiting from Sonoma State for an internet lecture I recently delivered to a group of visiting MBA students from Bordeaux…

      Please get this straight. I don’t ‘hate” you (although you are pushing me in that direction) I simply want to protect the majority of honourable winemakers from the consumer doubt you are propagating.

      Just provide EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE of your massively misleading claim of 20% of ALL wine being “fake”!

      Like

  22. SRR: I know little about wine, but quite a lot about (particularly) Chinese fakes. Everything else in the world is faked, so why -wouldn’t- the same type of person fake wine? Little chance of being caught out, very high markups, extremely portable and easy to sell, and unlike handbags very, very few people would have a clue. Looks a no bringer to me! I’m enjoying both sides of the discussion, but what’s the issue with 20%? It’s like you are using this magic figure as a defence in itself. As in ‘See, I was right, it is only 19.999% and you both said it was 20%’ As a rank amateur, it doesn’t matter if it’s 5% or 35%, that is a vast amount of product sold under false pretences for extreme profit at the expense of all those people out there trying to make an honest living in a market that is extremely difficult already. Or would you prefer your wine to come from a chemical factory in Shenzhen perched majestically on the banks of yet another toxic waste sludge pool?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hi Natasha. Good point and Chinese fakes ARE an issue
      – but if you read my earlier comment, they are far fewer than 20% of ALL the world’s wine

      Further, anyone who knows wine (including me) can tell a Chinese fakes simply by tasting it.

      Like

  23. Now, why the wild, wild world of sports do you presume I care if you “hate” me? Let me be clear – I could not give less of a hoot about what you think of me. (Oh, I am a woman, so I am supposed to care, right? Rather overtly sexist of you but not at all surprising….)

    You and yours have maligned me personally, slandered my company and denigrated our sincere efforts to combat wine fraud. You have insulted my nationality and disrespected all my countrymen. You derided my trainee Scott, and his honest efforts to do good by the wine industry. You have spread your defamation not only here, but in the other blog you had written to disparage both Scott and myself as well as in the messages you are sending out to individuals. All the while you are still mulishly refusing to recognize the supporting data and facts being presented. It has been rather a banner week+ for the uncovering of massive counterfeit operations, I must say. But you remain unphased.

    I can do nothing with those that choose to be ignorant. Historically, those that protest the loudest that are typically either involved, or they turn out to be fools. I have seen it time and again.
    Many believed that Kurniawan, Kapon, and then their cronies were not offloading millions in counterfeits from 2002 – 2012: I think you all know now – that they in fact were and today there are at least $550 million dollars of RK made counterfeits surviving in the marketplace today being returned and resold over and again. In 2011, was threatened with a lawsuit for claiming Eric Greenberg was knowingly selling counterfeit wine: A jury agreed with me to the tune of awarding a billionaire victim of his $12mill in punitive damages on $350k in counterfeit sales. (Greenberg has already sold over $40mill through Acker alone, how much counterfeit? Who knows!) I got all our clients out of Premier Cru over a year before John Fox went bankrupt owing clients over $70mill in undelivered wines, despite the loud cries from supporters that all was right and good there and there was no reason to be alarmed…. The list goes on, and on, and on. And so does the list of deniers, haters, and curmudgeons who cannot fathom that a GIRL might know more than they do about a topic involving wine. Strange that so many would rather benefit the fraudsters than aptly warn the wine consuming public.

    I’ve been dealing with people trying to quiet my warnings about wine fraud and counterfeiting since 2002. If you think I am afraid of haters – you have the wrong person. If you think a sexist line is going to appeal to my womanhood and make me nervous, needing your “approval” – you most definitely have the wrong woman. The list of fraudsters and counterfeiters, their enablers and accomplices that hate me is long, and not at all distinguished. Welcome aboard!

    The 20% number is not mine. It pertains to ALL WINE, not fine and rare wine. I believe that law enforcement, who support this number for wine –and all luxury goods– are correct. I trust them far more than an individual my colleagues and I have never heard of, and who lies about his affiliations to make himself relevant. (PS – It didn’t work for Gil Lempert-Schwarz in the Greenberg trial either. Recording one online lecture – if that is what you have done, does not a University affiliate make – lest I would have been “staff” at Boston University where I have taught several classes and given lectures since 1999!)

    We are doing valuable things to help clients attain remuneration for bad purchases at Chai Consulting. Through WineFraud.com we offer the first ever means for collectors and vendors alike to learn about authentication and have resources to authenticate. We are training authenticators all over the globe to combat this growing problem as well as creating and introducing cutting edge technology like the blockchain based, Chai Wine Vault by Everledger, (and the other amazing tech we are creating) to help producers protect their brands and supply chains, and to give consumers transparency into the authentication and provenance of the bottles they are buying, trading and consuming. We are actively part of the solution combating all sorts of wine frauds and counterfeiting, all over the globe.

    Denying the reality and scope of the problem of wine fraud only helps the ever-growing field of fraudsters who are banking on the low-risk high/reward environment that denial helps maintain. Historically, if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.

    Good Day!
    MD

    Like

    • Oh my Maureen. You are making a mountain out of a mole hill aren’t you ? Just PROVE your claim and I will apologise and go away.

      Like

  24. PLease contact to us to have free demo and free chip to anti-counterfeiting Jeptags.com

    Jeptags is the solution to anti-counterfeit on the market that uses chip to secure connections for the product to a consumer all around the world and 1st solution B2C to support anti-counterfeit. Its Headquareters is located in the Silicon Valley, California, USA. Jeptag is founded by a group of elite programmers with many years of experiences about anti-counterfeit, Information technology, network security and such. The Jeptags solution comes complete with smart label secure code (device) for product authentication and supply.

    Like

Please let us know your thoughts